Omitting Costs Did Not Affect Judgment Finality

In Saudi Refining, Inc. v. Combs, the Third Court of Appeals has held that it lacked jurisdiction to decide an appeal from a summary judgment signed in 2003.  In an opinion authored by Chief Justice W. Kenneth Law (pictured), the court rejected an argument that the omission of costs sought by the defendants was sufficient to render an otherwise final judgment interlocutory.  The court thus dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.texasappellatelawblog.com/admin/trackback/63127
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?