Back in 2009, I agreed to teach Appellate Practice and Procedure at Solo Practice University, a web-based educational and professional networking community where faculty from across the country teach lawyers and law students how to practice law. I then planned and self-produced a series of eight video lectures, which remain available at SPU with a paid enrollment. I created this series to inform and inspire lawyers considering a career in appellate law, particularly in a solo or small-firm setting. A brief introductory video appears above.
Over the next two months, I will be making these presentations available on this blog without charge. The lectures—which will be released in order and accompanied by a slidedeck prepared for each session—break down the elements of an appeal, provide tips for handling each element, explore the range of services appellate counsel can provide, and discuss the resources and skills necessary to succeed as an appellate lawyer.
Along with retiring Chief Deputy Clerk Michelle Brinkman, I spoke to the Austin Bar Civil Appellate Section today on “Tips for Superseding Travis County District Court Judgments.” New Travis County District Clerk Velva Price and incoming Chief Deputy Clerk Caroline Legette—both of whom are lawyers—attended the luncheon as Section guests. As a former Chair of the Section, I was pleased to be invited as a speaker.
I arrived early to make sure my MacBook would communicate with the venue’s projector and even had a backup plan, but alas, I could not get the projector to work. It may have been for the best. Supersedeas is a somewhat difficult topic, and not having slides forced me to try and engage the audience without visuals. Having Michelle present with me was a big plus, as she has more than a few war stories from her years in the trenches.
A big takeway from our discussion was to use the District Clerk’s bond calculation spreadsheet as a starting point for determining the amount needed to supersede a judgment pending appeal. The form has some rules emanating from case law and other sources built into it, and it is an extremely useful tool even if your case is not in Travis County.
It’s been five years since ThomsonReuters (then ThomsonWest) launched WestlawNext and re-branded the legal research database many lawyers grew up on as “Westlaw Classic.” I received notice yesterday that my firm’s access to the old version will cease at the end of March, leaving WestlawNext as the only option available under our contract. This is part of TR’s planned takedown of Westlaw Classic.
I have used WestlawNext exclusively since its launch. I find it fairly intuitive, and the interface is undoubtedly more pleasing to the eye than the old version. I love being able to filter searches down to a particular appellate court, save my research into folders, and share those folders with other users on our account. WestlawNext is not perfect, but it gets the job done for our practice.
It’s a cliché, but lawyers as a group are resistant to change. Some have hung onto Westlaw Classic tightly, either because they’re comfortable with it and it meets their needs or because they just won’t take the time to learn something new. Change is hard, but it’s inevitable. If you’re still using Westlaw Classic, it’s time to evolve.
Two Texas intermediate appellate courts have begun the new year under new leadership from judges whom the voters elevated from other positions on those courts. Jeff Rose (pictured) has taken the oath as Chief Justice of Austin’s Third Court of Appeals, and Sandee Bryan Marion has now assumed her duties as Chief Justice of San Antonio’s Fourth Court of Appeals. These promotions leave each court short one justice until the appointment process plays out.
Practicing in Austin and primarily before the Third Court, I have had the opportunity to watch Chief Justice Rose’s career develop and to get to know him both personally and as a jurist. He ran an excellent campaign devoid of party politics and has pledged to continue the good work begun by former Chief Justice Woodie Jones, who came to a court beleaguered by infighting and inefficiency when he took the helm six years ago. I expect Chief Justice Rose to lead a collegial court whose members are faithful to the law and take their responsibility to the people of Texas seriously.
Photo credit: Justice Scott Field (@ScottKingField) via Twitter
The Austin Bar Association Civil Appellate Law Section, along with several law-firm sponsors (including Smith Law Group, P.C.), is hosting a retirement reception for Third Court of Appeals Chief Justice Woodie Jones on Thursday, December 11, 2014, from 5:00 to 7:00 p.m. at the Headliners Club.
As many Austin-area readers know, Chief Justice Jones is winding up his second stint on the Third Court. He was elected Justice in 1998 and served in that capacity for twelve years. After a successful run in private practice, he unseated the incumbent chief justice in the 2008 election and has led the Court successfully ever since.
Justice Jeff Rose won a contested election to replace the Chief and knows he has big shoes to fill. Come out Thursday evening and help us celebrate Chief Justice Jones’s fine judicial career.
Republicans continued their dominance of statewide judicial races in yesterday’s election, with Chief Justice Nathan Hecht and Justices Jeff Brown, Jeff Boyd, and Phil Johnson winning new six-year terms on the Texas Supreme Court. In the Court of Criminal Appeals, Judge Bert Richardson, Kevin Patrick Yeary, and David Newell all prevailed by wide margins.
Two sitting court of appeals justices were elevated to chief justice of their respective courts, creating immediate judicial appointment opportunities for Governor-Elect Greg Abbott. Justice Jeff Rose defeated former Justice Diane Henson in the race to take the open seat being vacated by Third Court of Appeals Chief Justice Woodie Jones. Similarly, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion defeated Judge Irene Rios in the race to replace departing Chief Justice Catherine Stone on the Fourth Court of Appeals.
Recent appointee Justice Craig Stoddart and incumbent Justices Kem Thompson Frost and Ken Wise retained their positions on the Fifth and Fourteenth Courts, respectively. Incumbent Justice Dori Contreras Garza, a Democrat, narrowly retained her seat on the Thirteenth Court, defeating Republican challenger Doug Norman by just over 1,500 votes.
The only incumbent to lose an appellate-court race was First Court Justice Jim Sharp, a Democrat. Justice Sharp was defeated by Republican challenger, former district judge Russell Lloyd.
If you’ve received CaseMail updates this week, you’ve likely noticed something new when clicking on the link embedded in your notification emails. Last Friday, the Texas appellate courts got a major online upgrade with the launch of the new and improved txcourts.gov site.
The new site is very user-friendly and much more pleasing to the eye than the old one (courts.state.tx.us). It features drop-down menus and many functions common to modern web design, including a timeline for @txcourts on Twitter. And for those on the move, a well designed mobile version is available on handheld devices.
Content-wise, the user can easily access information about all Texas state courts, specific appellate courts and matters, procedural rules, e-filing, and a host of statistical and other resources. Users of the old site will be able to quickly locate the key information they’re used to accessing, such as online dockets, documents, and submission calendars. After navigating around a bit, I think appellate practitioners and other visitors will be pleased with the change.
When used appropriately, hyperlinks to specific portions of the record or to on-point authorities can be a very effective tool in the appellate lawyer’s arsenal. But are recent developments enhancing that tool or effectively taking it away?
Last year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit standardized the format for citing electronic official records. In such cases, the parties are to “cite the short citation form, “ROA,” followed by a period, followed by the page number. For example, “ROA.123.” 5th Cir. R. 28.2.2. The Fifth Circuit made this change largely because it had acquired the ability to generate hyperlinks to the record when uniformly cited, thereby allowing judges to jump to pages they (rather than the advocates) may find important.
Texas appellate courts aren’t far behind. According to a recent report to the Texas Judicial Council, the Fifth Circuit has inspired upcoming enhancements to the Texas Appeals Management and E-filing System (TAMES) that will include automatic linking to record citations. As an additional step, TAMES will “take a properly formatted cite and automatically link it to the case in Westlaw or LexisNexis.”
These developments flow from increased use of technology in processing appellate cases, as well as higher numbers of appellate judges who consume briefs electronically, i.e. on a large monitor or on an iPad. The flexibility and efficiency that goes along with screen reading is generally a good thing—it’s difficult to argue against giving judges the ability to easily pull up any case or record cite they choose when reviewing a party’s brief. And, standardizing record and case cites should level the playing field between the technology haves and have-nots. From the advocate’s perspective, though, hyperlinking everything will make it more challenging to set critical cases or key portions of the record apart.